Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Comparing film & digital
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol)
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:21:30 +0100
References: <088CC2B3-F7C3-4C99-AD81-0550DE7DA14F@gmail.com> <4B22DF5E.5000701@wanadoo.nl>

Hi Michiel,

I agree your opinion, but as I've commented to Richard, the tonal  
rendition seems to me more rich on film.

Thank you very much for looking and commenting,

Cheers
Lluis

El 12/12/2009, a las 1:10, Michiel Fokkema escribi?:

> Hi Lluis,
>
> I like the second best. But that's because it has less DOF.
> Very hard to make a decision when the lenses are different.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michiel Fokkema
>
> Lluis Ripoll Querol wrote:
>> From last Summer, same situation, 2 cameras, 2 different lenses,  
>> film and pixels...
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Sitges/L1008100BW.jpg.html
>> M8, probably with Tri Elmar
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Sitges/2009060230.jpg.html
>> M3, Zeiss Sonnar Opton, Ilford 50 ISO
>> What do you think?....
>> Thanks...
>> Saludos cordiales
>> Lluis
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/
>> http://photo.net/photos/lluisripoll
>> Blog:
>> http://lluisripollphotography.wordpress.com/
>> http://www.lrmusic.es
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll Querol) ([Leica] Comparing film & digital)
Message from michiel.fokkema at wanadoo.nl (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] Comparing film & digital)