Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2009/12/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Levels of critique
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 08:46:29 +0100
References: <C75030B3.5A842%mark@rabinergroup.com> <C0DAB597-5CAB-43DA-AC94-A2C33EB5817D@mac.com>

Mark is a category of his own ;-)

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog



On Dec 18, 2009, at 1:19 AM, George Lottermoser wrote:

> On Dec 17, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
> 
>> Perhaps the idea being that if our level of criticism is higher than the
>> level of work presented to it will be higher. Will rise to the occasion.
>> Perhaps the categories would help but I don't know.
>> I love categories. Hate to be put in them.
> 
> I've no desire to place you, Mark into any particular category.
> ;~)
> (or anyone else for that matter)
> 
> Just thinking out loud about the request for "harsher"
> (or, as I read it, more serious critiques).
> 
> Can't help wondering,
> "What aspects of the image do you want analyzed?
> Technical, aesthetic, ideas, the moment chosen, all of them?"
> 
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 



In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Levels of critique)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Levels of critique)