Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/01/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A non-scientific comparison of the E3 and M8u
From: richard.lists at gmail.com (Richard Man)
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:54:16 -0800
References: <10363428.1264214153729.JavaMail.root@wamui-june.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <78D60420-0720-4CD2-9C76-31ACDF77EE38@frozenlight.eu> <7ac27f4f1001222053i54553d9cu1e68bbda3a02c974@mail.gmail.com>

Oops good point. My bad. I will do another set. I am so used to using 4
different format that I forgot. Yhx.

On Jan 22, 2010 8:45 PM, "Nathan Wajsman" <photo at frozenlight.eu> wrote:

My guesses were 100% correct, and it was not even based on picture
quality...it was obvious from the aspect ratio in most cases. If you really
want to make a blind test, you must crop all the images square. Otherwise,
one can immediately see the 3:2 vs. 4:3 format from the respective cameras.

Cheers,
Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog

On Jan 23, 2010, at 3:35 AM, Doug Herr wrote: > Richard Man wrote: > >> Do
not peek at the EXIF...


In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] A non-scientific comparison of the E3 and M8u)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] A non-scientific comparison of the E3 and M8u)