Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It was mentioned in a TV commentary, that is why I asked the same question a few days ago, so far a couple of answers quoting 0.1 secs, but no written links seen so far. Frank On 1 Feb, 2010, at 16:50, Steve Barbour wrote: > > On Feb 1, 2010, at 8:34 AM, Frank Dernie wrote: > >> IIRC yes, in the Olympic Games there is a time after the gun goes off >> which is considered to be less than human reaction time, so if anybody >> goes during this period it is considered a false start. >> >> !!! > > amazing, documentaion of this fact/rule available? > > > Steve > > >> >> >> On 1 Feb, 2010, at 15:46, Steve Barbour wrote: >> >>> >>> On Feb 1, 2010, at 6:22 AM, Tim Gray wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat 30, Jan'10 at 6:19 PM -0800, Steve Barbour wrote: >>>>>> IIRC a Canadian sprinter was DQ'd for repeatedly reacting more >>>>>> quickly that was considered possible. >>>>> >>>>> Whatever happened to the runner's "anticipation of the gun" ? >>>> >>>> It's ok as long as you don't anticipate it too perfect. :D >>> >>> >>> hmmm... >>> >>> >>> they can call a false start even if the runner starts after the gun ?? >>> >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information