Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/02/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] GF1 vs Canon S90
From: msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad)
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 07:03:54 -0800
References: <9F07836ED74F1C42AA69DFBAF8A1E2F137861892D8@MBX1.asc.local> <C79D86BC.64DDB%joseph@yao.com>

if you actually look @ the 7-14 raw files uncorrected, you will see a
tremendous amount of distortion, thank god for software correction!

On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Joseph Yao <joseph at yao.com> wrote:

> My 2 cents:
>
> 1. The Lumix 14-45mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS lens is sharper than the Zuiko ED
> 14-42/3.5-5.6, and since the GF1 lacks built-in IS, you want a lens with
> built in IS, such as the Lumix 14-45mm.
>
> 2. The Lumix 7-14mm f/4.0 is excellent. I am blown away by its sharpness
> and
> minimal distortion.
>
> 3. The Lumix 'Leica' 14-50mm f/2.8-3.5 OIS was made by Panasonic for the
> Lumix L1 and Leica Digilux 3, but this is a 4/3 lens, not Micro 4/3.  When
> used on Micro 4/3 cameras via the Lumix DMW-MA1 4/3 to Micro 4/3 adapter,
> autofocus is disabled as this lens is not contrast AF compatible.  Same
> with
> Olympus 4/3 to Micro 4/3 adapter.
>
> Joseph
>
>
> On 14/02/2010 6:59 AM, "Kyle Cassidy" <kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu> wrote:
>
> > You can get a M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 for your GF-1, you can
> also
> > get a 7-14mm for it, & leica makes a 14-50. or you can get an adapter and
> put
> > almost any 3rd party lens on it.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>



-- 
 -------------------------------------
 regards, mehrdad


Replies: Reply from s.dimitrov at charter.net (slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] GF1 vs Canon S90)
In reply to: Message from kcassidy at asc.upenn.edu (Kyle Cassidy) ([Leica] GF1 vs Canon S90)
Message from joseph at yao.com (Joseph Yao) ([Leica] GF1 vs Canon S90)