Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The 2200 is a workhorse for sure. I used mine for 5yrs almost everyday before it finally ended up having an unfixable clog. It survived heat and water from Katrina during this time. The "only" down side to the 2200 is Epson K3 inks were not available yet so in order to get "true" B&W's there was a helluva learning curve, either using 3rd party ink tones are getting RIP software. That said though, I stil have 13x19's from my 2200 that look pretty damn good. I know have the 2400 which has been replaced by the 2880. The new K3 inks deliver true to form B&W images. I use Museo Silver Rag paper. Chris NOLA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Saganich" Subject: [Leica] Epson 2200 > Hello, > > My colleague wheeled an Epson 2200 into the office this morning with the > intent to sell it on ebay. I suggested we could set it up in the office > for printing B&W photographs and she thought that was a fine idea. I > don't have a clue about these inkjet things, is there potential for making > high quality inkjet images with a 2200? Or should I just let her sell-it. > > Just curious, because IMO this is an inevitable transition for me anyway > especially for small prints. > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information