Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Not meant to be in any way scientific, but I was very impressed with the output from the X1 when I got to try it briefly. See here plus a similar frame from the S2. http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/hoppyman/2/JX1.jpg.html Cheers Geoff http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman On 2 March 2010 10:32, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> wrote: > On Mar 1, 2010, at 3:57 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote: > > A reason why the X1 is a big deal. >> Same size or smaller camera. Twice the a acreage. Or darned close to it. >> > > However a CCD with a pixel size of only 6.8 (same size as M8 and 9) > > A reason why the S2 is a big deal. >> Same size or smaller camera. Twice the a acreage. Or darned close to it. >> > > However a CCD with a pixel size of only 6.0 (smaller than above) > > > Regards, > George Lottermoser > george at imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com > http://www.imagist.com/blog > http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >