Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] 75 2.5
From: photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 20:42:39 +0100
References: <8F114FE8-6BF7-4C65-BB5F-E539BED19A75@gmail.com>

I've been telling you guys it is the best lens in the current M lineup, 
regardless of its "budget" price.

Nathan

Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
http://www.nathanfoto.com

Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog






On Mar 5, 2010, at 7:08 PM, Leo Wesson wrote:

> 
> Never should have put that damn lens on my camera.
> I could so be a 15-35-75 kind of guy.
> 
> Leo Wesson
> photographer?videographer
> leo at leowesson.com
> 817?733?9157
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from rbaron at concentric.net (Robert D. Baron) ([Leica] 75 2.5)
In reply to: Message from leowesson at gmail.com (Leo Wesson) ([Leica] 75 2.5)