Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/03/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.
From: douglas.sharp at gmx.de (Douglas Sharp)
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:30:56 +0100
References: <420887777.9734851268414419283.JavaMail.root@dsmdc-mail-mbs12> <DE4FCC23-CB1A-45FC-95AA-1DA00426A007@mac.com> <19b6d42d1003121340ue5fe012v5ecf9ca3e3ed978a@mail.gmail.com> <A6239578-CFDB-445A-9665-793D25CB19E1@mac.com> <4248CEDE-C4C7-4B55-A2AF-6BC94B70E365@frozenlight.eu> <81C61203-29F2-4066-999B-E3D4AD9B5BEB@mac.com> <E4B95AA4-B689-4222-A8DC-3326329EDED5@mac.com> <8c8849061003140417q923ce19ka1fd0f25304a0ce1@mail.gmail.com>

My dream would be a digital back for a Rollei 3003!

Cheers
Douglas

On 14.03.2010 12:17, Jerry Justianto wrote:
> My dream would be F3HP body with d700 in it :)
>
> Jsj
>
>
> On 3/14/10, Tarek Charara<tcharara at mac.com>  wrote:
>    
>> Ditto!
>>
>> The Contax RTS system comes second for me, I really liked working with
>> that camera...
>>
>> All the best from the south of France!
>>
>> Tarek
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------
>> Tarek Charara
>> <http://www.pix-that-stimulate.com>
>>
>> NO ARCHIVE
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 14 mars 10 ? 01:04, George Lottermoser a ?crit :
>>
>>      
>>> agreed - love at first touch for me
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> George Lottermoser
>>> george at imagist.com
>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>>
>>> On Mar 13, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> And in mine when I was shooting film. In fact, the R8 is the most
>>>> ergonomically correct and comfortable SLR I have ever owned.
>>>>
>>>> Nathan
>>>>
>>>> Nathan Wajsman
>>>> Alicante, Spain
>>>> http://www.frozenlight.eu
>>>> http://www.greatpix.eu
>>>> http://www.nathanfoto.com
>>>>
>>>> Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0
>>>> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
>>>> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:01 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> True enough.
>>>>> Not small.
>>>>> Yet, extremely comfortable
>>>>> in my hands.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> George Lottermoser
>>>>> george at imagist.com
>>>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 12, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Vince Passaro wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>>> Slightly OT but I just saw my first live R8 today at Adorama and
>>>>>> the thing
>>>>>> is like the size of a European rental car. Yikes. It appears to
>>>>>> be double
>>>>>> the volume of my humble R4 Mod P; i.e., my R4 that works.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:35 PM, George Lottermoser<imagist3 at 
>>>>>> mac.com
>>>>>>              
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>                
>>>>>>              
>>>>>>> In some way I'm glad that I never looked through a Leica SL VF
>>>>>>> (view
>>>>>>> finder);
>>>>>>> As it seems one forever sees all others (including R8) lacking.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My only 35mm SLR VF experiences:
>>>>>>> Nikon F
>>>>>>> FtN
>>>>>>> F2
>>>>>>> F5
>>>>>>> N90
>>>>>>> Canon 10D
>>>>>>> 20D
>>>>>>> 5D
>>>>>>> Leica R3
>>>>>>> R8
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> R8 wins in that line up with a very significant lead.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So I feel very happy in my ignorance,
>>>>>>> continuing to feel I have the best available Digital SLR VF.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ;~)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> George Lottermoser
>>>>>>> george at imagist.com
>>>>>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>>>>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 12, 2010, at 11:20 AM, grduprey at mchsi.com wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The F's mirror assembly is far superior to the current Nikon
>>>>>>> Line, very
>>>>>>>                
>>>>>>>> well built and far quieter than the current Nikon line, Period.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As for Viewfinder brightness, I'm with Doug, SL #1, then the
>>>>>>>> R8.  the rest
>>>>>>>> just don't cut it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gene
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>>> From: Doug Herr<wildlightphoto at earthlink.net>
>>>>>>>> To: Leica Users Group<lug at leica-users.org>
>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:46:24 -0600 (CST)
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Chris Williams wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So we need a D3 body and an F VF? I'll go along with that. I've
>>>>>>>> seen
>>>>>>>>                  
>>>>>>>>> people
>>>>>>>>> pound nails with the bottom of the D3 on youtube.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>                    
>>>>>>>> An SL viewfinder would be better.  The F viewfinder's pretty
>>>>>>>> good though.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Doug Herr
>>>>>>>> Birdman of Sacramento
>>>>>>>> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
>>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
>>>>>>> information
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
>>>>>> information
>>>>>>              
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>          
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>        
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>      
>    


In reply to: Message from grduprey at mchsi.com (grduprey at mchsi.com) ([Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.)
Message from tcharara at mac.com (Tarek Charara) ([Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.)
Message from jsjgroups at gmail.com (Jerry Justianto) ([Leica] Digital SLR viewfinders suck.)