Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Demise of film
From: jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj)
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 15:37:35 +0530
References: <k2r6a7544a61004010830h591711e6ve591498deaec0bfa@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20100401142146.035ef030@med.cornell.edu>

Another Rochester survivor of those days was Bausch & Lomb.
Cheers
Jayanand

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Chris Saganich <chs2018 at 
med.cornell.edu>wrote:

>
> Eastman set-up that town for failure early on.  Before Eastman put the
> screws to the place Rochester was one of the most successful and creative
> cities in the North East regarding technology.  That's the reason Eastman
> set up shop there because of the already highly advanced work in precision
> manufacturing and  optical work.  Eastman came to complete dominate the
> Rochester economy choking off or swallowing up nearly every other business
> in town.  Xerox, named Haloid at the time was a photo supply operation and
> survived the Eastman onslaught because they were so small as to go
> unnoticed.  They bought the rights to a process invented by a clerk in an
> electrical machine patten office to copy diagrams for patten research and
> then developed photo-copy paper and machines to use the process.  By that
> time Rochester was already a efficient company town and Xerox despite its
> innovative spirit couldn't return Rochester to its pre-Kodak dynamic
> economy.  Efficient company towns are destined to stagnate and fail so if
> your living in one get-out while you can and don't look back!
>
> Chris
>
>
> At 11:30 AM 4/1/2010, you wrote:
>
>> *Q. What percent of your sales are film cameras?*
>>
>> The film cameras are running under 5 percent.
>>
>> This doesn't really tell me anything. Is that based on unit sales or
>> revenue?
>>
>> Even if you knew the answer, the real question is how many units  of
>> film cameras were sold last year compared to the units sold the year
>> before that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Richard Man wrote:
>> > Sad. The digital onslaught continues...
>> >
>> >
>>
>> http://www.northjersey.com/news/89346507_Leica_president_focused_on_big_picture.html?c=y&page=1
>> >
>> - - - - - - -
>>
>> The real question is how much film is being sold and how long will it
>> continue to be available. Film cameras live a very long time. I took some
>> pictures the other day with a 60 year old camera (Leica IIIc) using an 80
>> year old lens (Elmar 35mm f3.5).  According to my two relatives still
>> gainfully employed at at Kodak the commercial film operation will be shut
>> down within 10 years. This brings a sense of gloom and doom to Rochester,
>> NY, a city that prospered on the basis of full Kodak employment. Too bad.
>> Rochester and its suburbs are really quite nice and houses and real estate
>> are going at a small fraction of their price in boom years.
>>
>> Now if everyone bought Leicas with Kodak made sensors - - -
>>
>> Larry Z (a dissatisfied Kodak stockholder)
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] Demise of film)
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] Demise of film)
Message from chs2018 at med.cornell.edu (Chris Saganich) ([Leica] Demise of film)