Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Got it. I was under the impression that it was in the body. I usually associate VR in lenses with those enormous Nikon lenses on dSLR cameras. Jeffery On Apr 2, 2010, at 11:53 PM, Vince Passaro wrote: > Jeffery: > It's not that IS "doesn't work" in the Pana GF-1 with the 20mm lens: it > doesn't exist. Panasonic puts it in the lenses but not in a lens that > small. > Olympus puts it in the body. > > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Jeffery Smith <jsmith342 at gmail.com> > wrote: > >>> From what I gather, the image stabilization doesn't work on the Panasonic >> GF-1 with the 20/1.7 pancake. But I agree with you. And it seems like a >> sounder idea to move the sensor rather than shifting the position of >> elements in the lens. >> >> Jeffery >> >>> Sonny Carter wrote: >>> >>>> I enjoy having the stabilization in the body because it affects ALL the >>>> lenses I put on the camera. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information