Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Wow, the last word on bokeh, from Zeiss
From: jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:38:54 -0500
References: <380-2201041122265299@M2W111.mail2web.com>
 
IF there can be good bokeh, bad bokeh, and ugly bokeh, then they must have 
different attributes. Can't be an all or nothing.

Jeffery

On Apr 12, 2010, at 5:06 PM, wildlightphoto at earthlink.net wrote:

> Marty Deveney wrote:
> 
>>>> 
> they have misdefined bokeh.  It's not the "attributes of the
> blur", it _is_ the blur.
> <<<
> 
> My understanding is that it's the attributes of the blur.
> 
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web.com - Microsoft? Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
> http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
Replies: Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] Wow, the last word on bokeh, from Zeiss)
 In reply to: Message from wildlightphoto at earthlink.net (wildlightphoto at earthlink.net) ([Leica] Wow, the last word on bokeh, from Zeiss)