Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Wow, the last word on bokeh, from Zeiss
From: passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro)
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:39:07 -0400
References: <x2t42854b301004130047g5b054e49m61e3888feb94f4bd@mail.gmail.com>
 
Funny, I find it an attractive word, even faintly erotic in a Japanese-porn
sort of way; the concept itself however I find stupendously overrated and
overdiscussed.

V

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Neil Beddoe <neilbeddoe at 
googlemail.com>wrote:

> Either way it's an ugly and utterly unnecessary word which thankfully
> remains meaningless to anyone but camera geeks like us.
>
> Neil
>
> Doug wrote.
>
> >>Marty Deveney wrote:
>
> >*>>*
> they have misdefined bokeh.  It's not the "attributes of the
> blur", it _is_ the blur.
> <<<
>
> >>My understanding is that it's the attributes of the blur.
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramentohttp://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] Wow, the last word on bokeh, from Zeiss)
 In reply to: Message from neilbeddoe at googlemail.com (Neil Beddoe) ([Leica] Wow, the last word on bokeh, from Zeiss)