Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Why Micro-4-3rds?
From: digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird)
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:08:02 -0500
References: <C7ED54FD.6158A%mark@rabinergroup.com>

The best camera sometimes is the camera you have WITH you. I carry my  
GF1 everywhere I go, except to bars;), while my full-frame Canon sits  
at home or at work, and from some of the shots I've seen so far on

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:42 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com>  
wrote:

>> Micro-4/3rds cameras are certainly serious cameras, it's just a  
>> question of
>> what your needs or desires are.  If I were a professional and  
>> needed to
>> satisfy editors who demanded full-frame quality, I'd have full- 
>> frame camera,
>> too.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dick
>>
>
>
> A Leica M6 is a serous camera. Most of Magnum was using them.
> A micro 4/3's I bet some of them have in the bottom of their camera  
> bags.
> So they can shoot each other when they get drunk in bars.
> A micro 4/3 should not be motioned in the same breath as the Leica M  
> system.
> Or pro DSLRS.
>
>
>
> [Rabs]
> Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Why Micro-4-3rds?)