Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] M9 'Err' - Faulty Shutter
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:12:19 +0930
References: <C7EE79CB.61677%mark@rabinergroup.com> <78854DB2-C7A9-47B8-9429-CB3466B0C3D2@gmail.com> <COL119-W36C7345F05A53A29660D20820D0@phx.gbl>

Yes, and optically the edges were much less impressive than most of
their other glass on film or now on the M9.  It was definitely built
primarily for the M8.

Marty


On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Greg Lorenzo
<gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Jeffery Smith writes:
>
>
>> Leica's following is what has kept them successful. Leica is the only 
>> lens maker that seems to have never compromised their quality on purpose. 
>> There have been some bumps, but not deliberate sacrifices on quality. 
>> It's refreshing that at least one lens company hasn't buckled under to 
>> WalMart demand.
>
> The most recent 28/2.8 Elmar lens which I purchased new a couple of years 
> back was in my mind a compromise. Built to a lesser standard then any 
> other Leica lens I've owned.
>
> Greg Lorenzo
> Calgary, Canada
> _________________________________________________________________
> The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with 
> Hotmail.
> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?tile=multicalendar&ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_5
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] M9 'Err' - Faulty Shutter)
Message from jsmith342 at gmail.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] M9 'Err' - Faulty Shutter)
Message from gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com (Greg Lorenzo) ([Leica] M9 'Err' - Faulty Shutter)