Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Good Bokeh?
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 10:31:40 +0930
References: <v2gdaaeb97e1004172312md9e6dc0fk6878be709094d38b@mail.gmail.com> <F49DA823-3821-4D24-98BD-218ED5F08B2A@mac.com> <y2wdaaeb97e1004181220s5d7b9bd3oa65499b6db82cbcc@mail.gmail.com> <B9056380-1806-4679-AECB-576A074B5572@mac.com> <h2odaaeb97e1004181647pf1daa320l9f631412b94a4fa9@mail.gmail.com>

Wide open adds another factor to the "worst case scenario" of this
shot.  Very difficult.

Marty


On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:17 AM, James Laird <digiratidoc at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> George,
>
> Yes, I'm pretty sure it was taken at f4. It was dusk and light was
> fading. I'll try it again stopped down.
>
> Jim
>
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 4:48 PM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> 
> wrote:
>> was the sample you posted wide open?
>> have you tried it at other f stops?
>> just curious.
>>
>> Regards,
>> George Lottermoser
>> george at imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com
>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>
>> On Apr 18, 2010, at 2:20 PM, James Laird wrote:
>>
>>> George,
>>>
>>> I see what you mean. I thought it was moderately good bokeh when I
>>> first took it. But as you say it's all subjective. Oh well, I only
>>> paid 49 bucks for it. Maybe I can get a Leica R 200 some day for that
>>> price (in my dreams;)
>>>
>>> Jim Laird
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 11:53 AM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at 
>>> mac.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> obviously subjective
>>>> but I find the bokeh
>>>> quite disturbing
>>>> reminds me of the glass
>>>> used in some bathroom windows.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> George Lottermoser
>>>> george at imagist.com
>>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 18, 2010, at 1:12 AM, James Laird wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Trying out my 'new' Nikkor 200 f4 on my GH1 I took this:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/digiratidoc/GH1/Nikkor-200f4-Bokeh.jpg.html>
>>>>>
>>>>> Now I think this is great bokeh. Agree?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jim Laird
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] OT: Good Bokeh?)
In reply to: Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: Good Bokeh?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: Good Bokeh?)
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: Good Bokeh?)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: Good Bokeh?)
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: Good Bokeh?)