Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I agree with Nathan about the difficulty of making comparison. I think that the two just reflect how you need to choose your film/sensor characteristicsto give the kind of balance you want. The film is warmer, the sensor colder; or to be exact, the former redder, the latter bluer. What do others know about the characteristics of VS? Peter Dzwig Nathan Wajsman wrote: > The M3 photo is a better composition, but the M8 photo has better skin > tones (at least on my iMac). But there are too many variables involved to > make a valid technical comparison, most important being that you are using > different lenses and scanning film vs. direct digital capture. > > Cheers, > Nathan > > Nathan Wajsman > Alicante, Spain > http://www.frozenlight.eu > http://www.greatpix.eu > http://www.nathanfoto.com > > Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 > PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws > Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog > > > > > > > On Apr 17, 2010, at 5:19 PM, Peter Cheyne wrote: > >> I took these two photos of my friend's son a couple of weeks ago. I was >> interested to see the differences. >> >> M3, Kodak E100VS, Nokton 35 >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/geordiepete/4514083293/sizes/l/ >> >> M8, ISO 160, Summicron 50 >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/geordiepete/4492995105/sizes/l/ >> >> Peter >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- =========================================================== Dr Peter Dzwig