Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] The Flatiron Building
From: passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro)
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:37:57 -0400
References: <v2o6a7544a61004201200x9c7745cdi9e2ad9d115f73fc7@mail.gmail.com> <q2z19b6d42d1004201326p98bdabe8i6abb77f7906d2511@mail.gmail.com> <A38DBD68766D409AAF42DD4E137D5F66@qck8vqhgou8blu>
 
Hey wait a minute. They didn't HAVE photoshop in 1906.

On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:35 PM, A. Lal <alal at poly.edu> wrote:

> Are you sure this is a 1906 photo? Some of the motor vehicles look more
> modern than 1906.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Vince Passaro" <
> passaro.vince at gmail.com>
> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 4:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] The Flatiron Building
>
>
>
>  There's actually more development there than I would have thought for
>> 1906.
>> What a picture. It looks like the Times had one of Van Gogh's descendents
>> work on it in Photoshop.
>>
>> Vince
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
In reply to: Message from lrzeitlin at gmail.com (Lawrence Zeitlin) ([Leica] The Flatiron Building)
Message from passaro.vince at gmail.com (Vince Passaro) ([Leica] The Flatiron Building)
Message from alal at poly.edu (A. Lal) ([Leica] The Flatiron Building)