Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/04/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] potential for additional BP rig problems
From: gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com (Greg Lorenzo)
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 19:07:49 -0600
References: <530AF7A6-17E9-4367-8CDC-41F5639EFE24@mac.com>, <COL119-W346DAE2A7740B413CE37E182F00@phx.gbl>, <6E623A75-22CD-4F6F-BA1C-731A0788DADC@mac.com>
 
imagist3 at mac.com writes:

> Interesting thought.
> Haven't read anyone else voicing this possibility.
>
> I assume that besides the oil
> there's a whole lot of natural gas escaping as well.
 
Extremely unlikely, unless that particular pool has a gas cap and BP 
mistakingly shot (perforated) too high (even more unlikely).
 
Greg Lorenzo
Calgary, Canada                                           
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_1
In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] potential for additional BP rig problems)
Message from gregj_lorenzo at hotmail.com (Greg Lorenzo) ([Leica] potential for additional BP rig problems)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] potential for additional BP rig problems)