Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/05/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] OT: Good B+W Lab
From: digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird)
Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 11:58:05 -0500
References: <4BDE2535.8010503@cox.net> <C803C501.62035%mark@rabinergroup.com> <i2udaaeb97e1005022158ted344c51p30587e016f216cca@mail.gmail.com> <D62044CD-4936-45B9-995B-805D676909C9@mac.com>

Now that is a GREAT idea. Thanks.

Jim Laird

On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 10:28 AM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at mac.com> 
wrote:
> If you're going all digital (but for the film)
> you may want to consider
> scanning the negatives as a group on a flat bed scanner.
> That's what I was doing during the last of my film days.
> worked well and allowed me to view on screen as with a loupe.
> Printed on laser printer and filed with film.
>
> Regards,
> George Lottermoser
> george at imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com
> http://www.imagist.com/blog
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>
> On May 2, 2010, at 11:58 PM, James Laird wrote:
>
>> Of course the cameras and film will actually be the only 'traditional'
>> part. I intend to scan, photoshop and print the shots I like from the
>> contact sheet. I just felt like giving film another try. Probably just
>> 'middle aged' crazy but it'll be fun.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: Good B+W Lab)
In reply to: Message from kcarney1 at cox.net (Ken Carney) ([Leica] OT: Good B+W Lab)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] OT: Good B+W Lab)
Message from digiratidoc at gmail.com (James Laird) ([Leica] OT: Good B+W Lab)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] OT: Good B+W Lab)