Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/05/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: kids, dogs, disturbing?
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 13:08:48 -0500
References: <05BE4D6A-412C-4D37-AE0D-DF4CAD937AE6@mac.com> <C1D76019-B9FF-4AF3-A250-A0DB5138EA97@mac.com>

thank you Hugh.
I'm delighted that found a slight "disturbance" for a moment.
I felt it a bit when I first looked at the image;
yet wasn't sure if it could be simply attributed to
my personal relationship with the subject.


Regards,
George Lottermoser
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist

On May 4, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Hugh Thompson wrote:

> George - yes the first one is initially disturbing, but as one's  
> brain begins to figure it out, one can see how clever it is.  Very  
> neat.  As for the dog, such fun, and it shows.
>
> Hugh
>
>
> On 4-May-10, at 8:44 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>
>> <http://www.imagist.com/blog/?p=2234>
>
> hewthompson at mac.com
> Kabul, Afghanistan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] IMG: kids, dogs, disturbing?)
Message from hewthompson at mac.com (Hugh Thompson) ([Leica] IMG: kids, dogs, disturbing?)