Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] "Re"
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 14:20:43 -0500
References: <p06240809c8592f4c6407@[192.168.1.103]>

Herb,

Most of us just select the title in the list of messages, and then click on 
"Reply", at least that is what works in Outlook Express.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Herbert Kanner" <kanner at acm.org>
To: <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 2:11 PM
Subject: [Leica] "Re"


> Yesterday, I sent the query in the following paragraph to 
> "mailman at leica-users.org" as directed by the web site. THe mail bounced 
> as 
> "user unknown".
>
> I notice that all "Re [some LUG contribution]" have a standard format, 
> indicating that they are semi-automatically generated. So, what is the 
> technique for responding to a particular LUG item? I can't believe that 
> there is that much uniformity in format if people clipped out the item and 
> formulated their response email by hand.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Herb
> -- 
> Herbert Kanner
> kanner at acm.org
> 650-326-8204
>
> Do not meddle in the affairs of cats,
> for they are subtle and will pee
> on your computer!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




In reply to: Message from kanner at acm.org (Herbert Kanner) ([Leica] "Re")