Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/07/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2010 01:20:09 -0400

Do you recall if it was late in his career when he was shooting with the
Hasselblad or earlier with sheet film?

-- 
Mark William Rabiner
mark at rabinergroup.com


> From: Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2010 14:33:34 +1000
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?
> 
> Mine is a silver gelatin print from an original negative, printed by Alan
> Ross. I don't claim any rarity or collectibility for that of course but
> there is just one source and one skilled darkroom printmaker for these
> and has been since 1975 after he worked as Ansel Adams' assistant. If it 
> was
> exceedingly rare or collectible then I simply couldn't justify spending
> perhaps 8 or 10,000 dollars or more for a print. However it is from Ansel's
> creation, has been meticulously made and is gorgeous to my eyes. My print 
> is
> professionally and archivally framed and hangs where I can look at it and
> enjoy it every single say. I don't have anything from Yosemite that I shot
> hanging within sight of it ;-)
> 
> Cheers
> Geoff
> http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman




Replies: Reply from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?)
In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] AA or Uncle Earl?)