Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Chicago alley wall peeling paint 135mm f4.5 Hektor
From: jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols)
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 21:42:26 -0500
References: <C8D529A4.4C08%mark@rabinergroup.com>

A nice one, Mark.

Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark at rabinergroup.com>
To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 7:03 PM
Subject: [Leica] Chicago alley wall peeling paint 135mm f4.5 Hektor


> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/chicago+wall+ST.jpg.html
>
> 135mm f4.5 Hektor I got for 99 bucks Oct/7/2001.
> With my first M6 classic.
> It was made in the early 50's just like me.
> 15-blade diaphragm for the sure verisimilitude of a nice circle of non
> confusion.
>
> I would almost always use it with a very dark green or red filter.
> The film was Tri X in Rodinal 1:75
> It was scanned from a fiber 8x10 print made with a 63mm Nikor 2.8. A thing 
> I
> don't have fond feelings about doing much of any more preferring a neg 
> scan
> and re thinking it.
>
> Yes I had a bit of fun with the new raw filter cs5 doing a duotone with 
> it.
> It was heavily toned as a print but not I don't think these colors. I 
> think
> it was rather cold toned. But bricks are red so there you go. This is how 
> it
> looks this time.
>
> The head comes off I can use it with my viso and it focuses to infinity.
> Also with the bellows if I recall.
>
> It sure as hell has a Leica fingerprint but at this magnification I'm not
> sure if we're really experiencing much of it. More of a fig Newton of our
> own imaginations. Do the RGB line up The smart money says no!!
>
> Ken Lincoln Rockwell has a nice layout on it. I'm not finding any thing 
> here
> I'm disagreeing with. He does this just to confuse us.
> http://www.kenrockwell.com/leica/135mm-f45.htm
>
> He says " This is among the softest lenses I've used."
> Yep! But I sure don't shoot it wide open and I'd print it with as much
> contrast as I could squeeze out of it and now with unsharp mask it becomes
> less of an issue as you could just add on a little more.
> But its "Leica fingerprint" would be at one point its blazing non 
> sharpness.
> Its not an APO ASPH.
> Its the best 99 bucks I ever spent.
>
> It has that certain something.
> je ne sais quoi
> Lens design not at its apex. Which just makes it more fun to use.
>
> I found the tiny frame lens like a cursor not on my monitor but on the
> world.
>
> The Rabs
>
> --------------------
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> mark at rabinergroup.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> 




In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Chicago alley wall peeling paint 135mm f4.5 Hektor)