Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] I am "Underexposed!"
From: steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour)
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 12:17:59 -0700
References: <13963087.1287012406530.JavaMail.root@mswamui-backed.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <AANLkTinmxVi1fv9WVGpUb2mg7QYHHn8Ck-OOSTKCRiRe@mail.gmail.com> <6C05754A-4863-42D8-904D-B54F8E498B4D@gmail.com> <AANLkTiky=L3nhzMaJeCjCEwD5UOjaROGi1r6YFP-ZyqO@mail.gmail.com>

On Oct 14, 2010, at 12:10 PM, Richard Man wrote:

> Correct! So how did you you guess? I thought I added a little "noise" via
> LR, is that what gives it away?
> 
> Good one Sir!


thank you...


it has a certain je ne sais quoi...

actually I'd be the first to say that with web jpegs of this size, there is 
no way to tell,

so a random guess may be  helpful,


Steve


> 
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Steve Barbour <steve.barbour at 
> gmail.com>wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Oct 13, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Richard Man wrote:
>> 
>>> There is actually one M9 image in the set. Can anyone pick it out?
>> (Without
>>> looking at the EXIF etc., which I think should not be there).
>> 
>> perhaps the bay, and alcatraz...?
>> 
>> 
>> Steve
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Montie Talbert <montoid at earthlink.net
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I knew those "Mighty Pans" had potential!
>>>> Congrats!
>>>> 
>>>> Montie
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> I got accepted by the Photo Tech Mag's online Underexposed section:
>>>> http://www.phototechmag.com/index.php/underexposed
>>>> 
>>>> Here's my section:
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.phototechmag.com/index.php/underexposed/richard-man/
>>>> 
>>>> (so happy)
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
>>>> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com>
>>>> // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
>>>> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all
>> previous
>>>> replies in your msgs. ]
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Leica Users Group.
>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
>>> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com>
>>> // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
>>> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all
>> previous
>>> replies in your msgs. ]
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.wordpress.com>
> // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
> replies in your msgs. ]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from montoid at earthlink.net (Montie Talbert) ([Leica] I am "Underexposed!")
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] I am "Underexposed!")
Message from steve.barbour at gmail.com (Steve Barbour) ([Leica] I am "Underexposed!")
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] I am "Underexposed!")