Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] D700
From: photo.forrest at earthlink.net (Phil)
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:27:21 -0400
References: <991794EB-BB27-48EF-AFA0-ECC2E426D94E@mac.com> <C8E7E814.5695%mark@rabinergroup.com>

Tee hee hee hee hee hee!


On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 01:17:08 -0400
Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote:

> Well we'll compare my prints from my lens with the ones you got from
> yours.
> 
> 
> --------------------
> Mark William Rabiner
> Photography
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> mark at rabinergroup.com
> Cars:   http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > From: Christopher Williams <zoeica at mac.com>
> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> > Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:46:13 -0500
> > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] D700
> > 
> > The Internet knows all, but not as much as me.
> > 
> > Chris
> > 
> > Developed from my iHolga
> > 
> > 
> > On Oct 22, 2010, at 8:14 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> My experience with using the lens extensively for the past 7.1
> >> years seems to differ with yours Christopher! As does every known
> >> source on the internet! 
> >> This one is better than the current one.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> --------------------
> >> Mark William Rabiner
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> From: Christopher Williams <zoeica at mac.com>
> >>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> >>> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:53:04 -0500
> >>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> >>> Subject: Re: [Leica] D700
> >>> 
> >>> Sorry but that lens is one of the worst ones Nikon ever made. At
> >>> 24 it's a joke. The f4 version was slightly improved.
> >>> 
> >>> Chris
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> Developed from my iHolga
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> On Oct 22, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> Nope its an older real lens.
> >>>> FX or
> >>>> FF
> >>>> Nikon 24-85 f/3.5-4.5 ED AF-S G
> >>>> 
> >>>> http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/2485afs.htm
> >>>> http://www.bythom.com/2485lens.htm
> >>>> http://www.momentcorp.com/review/nikkor24-85_35.htm
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> --------------------
> >>>> Mark William Rabiner Photography
> >>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/
> >>>> Cars:   http://tinyurl.com/2f7ptxb
> >>>> mark at rabinergroup.com
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>>> From: Kyle Cassidy <leicaslacker at gmail.com>
> >>>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> >>>>> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:51:03 -0400
> >>>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> >>>>> Subject: Re: [Leica] D700
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> as long as it's not DX!
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> My 24 to 85 G lens seems to be all I'd need 99.9 of the time.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Leica Users Group.
> >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> >>>>> information
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Leica Users Group.
> >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> >>>> information
> >>> 
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Leica Users Group.
> >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> >>> information
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Leica Users Group.
> >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more
> >> information
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from zoeica at mac.com (Chris Williams) ([Leica] D700)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] D700)