Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/10/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] NYC - almost one camera one lens
From: leicaslacker at gmail.com (kyle cassidy on the LUG)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:56:01 -0400
References: <82730767-82F2-4614-B41E-C91EEAA64464@mac.com> <CC993A32-A9B3-49A5-9434-2D98E4BBEDA0@mac.com> <AANLkTinp_2P+U0Vu5EyqbpaNtWQ06+LdFrarVmH6pMaT@mail.gmail.com>
 
I will remind you all that the Ur Digilux is IMMUNE to dust on the sensor. 
It can't happen. No dust. Ever. Take that Nikon.


On Oct 25, 2010, at 4:50 PM, Richard Man wrote:

> On a web sized pic, even a pinky nail mini-4/3-quarter-full-frame camera 
> can
> look good.
> 
> Heck, just look at Kyle's gen-u-wine 1 megapixel photos!
> 
> (tongue firmly in cheek)
> 
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:46 PM, George Lottermoser <imagist3 at 
> mac.com>wrote:
> 
>> Gorgeous set of photographs Chris.
>> 
>> (and made with one of those obsolete old
>> "never was any good" M8,
>> 1.3 cropped Leaker cameras too.
>> How in the world did you make 'em look
>> so purty?)
In reply to: Message from zoeica at mac.com (Chris Williams) ([Leica] NYC - almost one camera one lens)
Message from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] NYC - almost one camera one lens)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] NYC - almost one camera one lens)