Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Greetings Pasvorn, Thanks for looking! The paintings are watercolor on paper and I believe Noedup said, it's been more than 25 years and the memory is a bit foggy, that a friend painted the Chinese calligraphy. Noedup also said, I believe, that the Tibetan tradition is to not sign works, but some of these were exhibited in China and have a Tibetan signature stamp. Noedup also said that the Tibetan calligraphy was of especially pithy sayings and then laughed. Richard Man would know more, in writing this response, I realize how little I know. I bought these as a youth, I'm now an adult and still stupid, maybe more so. John On 11/17/10 12:04 AM, Pasvorn Boonmark wrote: > HI John, > > Forgive my ignorant. > When look closer, this looks like ink on paper, correct? > > Somehow, it reminds me of Japanese woodcut print. > > Beautiful. > > Thank you for sharing. > > -Pasvorn > > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:06 PM, John Nebel<john.nebel at csdco.com> > wrote: >> http://thangkas.csd.net/pindola_bharadvaja_16.html >> >> Somewhat different from the previous paintings, this is the first of a >> series of sixteen based on now lost 9th century works. >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information