Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Actually, the most exciting conclusion is that a $10K MF digital can rival a high end back. On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Henning Wulff <henningw at archiphoto.com>wrote: > On Luminous Landscape: http://thurly.net/0bdu > > Not a particularly well engineered comparison, but interesting never the > less. It provides some insight into the differences between an M9 and an MF > camera (and incidentally, a Canon 1Ds III). > > Some of the things they discovered are well known to users of Canons and > Leicas; ie, there is a 'veil' over the Canon images, and post processing > cannot achieve the accutance of the M9 images. Also, putting a 24-105 zoom > on the Canon is just giving away way too much when the Leica sports a 50 > ASPH. > > But basically, an M9 can, with good technique, stand up quite well to MF at > sizes up to A3+. > > -- > > * Henning J. Wulff > /|\ Wulff Photography & Design > /###\ mailto:henningw at archiphoto.com > |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/> // photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]