Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It is just some diffraction effect, which may not show up as much on a web image. I managed to accidentally change the camera dial from aperture preference to shutter preference, hence a number of photos taken at very small apertures. The Canon 200mm 2.8L is very sharp wide open or stopped down a little, not as much past that. Further complicating this is that I am about three years behind on an eye exam. Why introduce just one variable when you can have several? :) Ken On 11/20/2010 7:19 PM, Ric Carter wrote: > i don;t see the sharpness problems which concern you > > ric > > On Nov 20, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Ken Carney wrote: > >> I came up with these two. I had some that were better, but somehow or >> another they were taken at f/25, f/32 and so forth and not usable. >> Proving once again there is no end to mistakes. C&C welcome as always. >> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/kcarney/20101120_001.jpg.html >> >> This one wound up being at f/13, and is not as sharp as I would like: >> >> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/kcarney/20101120_003.jpg.html >> >> Off to get some duct tape for that aperture wheel. >> >> Ken >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >