Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/11/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Rarities
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 23:59:35 +0100
References: <E6D9448D-F064-42E7-9285-1D3EC934F135@gmail.com> <81869818e5f7ca5fe033f7d262bacbab.squirrel@emailmg.globat.com>

Thank Alastair,

I prefer too the inversed, it gives a rare effect like the leaves are  
flotating,

Thanks for looking and comenting,

Saludos
Lluis


El 26/11/2010, a las 23:50, afirkin at afirkin.com escribi?:

>> This the original image
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Abstracts/ 
>> L1016996wse.jpg.html
>>
>> This one rotated 180?
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/luisrq/Abstracts/L1016996wser.jpg.html
>>
>> M8, Tri Elmar
>>
>> Thanks for looking, your c&c are welcome
>>
>> Saludos cordiales
>> Lluis
>
> something went wrong with my first reply to this, so I hope you  
> don't end
> up with 2.
>
> I think the rotated image is more "pleasant" on the eye, there is a
> tension in the first composition, which is probably related to the
> reversed/mirrored aspect of the reflection, but also the floating  
> leaves
> are too much the subject. Rotated the leaves fade into the distance  
> more
> effectively and don't hold my attention, so as an "abstract" with  
> "hidden"
> reality, I would hand the print rotated.
>
> Cheers
>
> Alastair
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] Rarities)
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] Rarities)