Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2010/12/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Arhat Bakula
From: pasvorn at boonmark.net (Pasvorn Boonmark)
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:33:28 -0800
References: <4CFEBD89.8040203@csdco.com> <AANLkTimUhFTA5DzgzJvPqK1n8Mft7D0doj3jOMt99zP0@mail.gmail.com> <4CFEC4E1.3030901@csdco.com> <AANLkTi=Kt8boZ35i4qjcw86EkPOKkS00DG6PB8yVsSOa@mail.gmail.com> <4CFF93D0.4060602@csdco.com>
 
John,

Oh, so the original is etched in stones?
Interesting.  Thank you very much for the references.

-Pasvorn


On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:18 AM, John Nebel <john.nebel at csdco.com> wrote:
> Pasvorn,
>
> Here is a reference - Harvard messed up a few of the identifications, but 
> so
> did the Chinese in the 18th century. ? The Harvard library rubbings are 
> made
> from the stone copies of the originals. ?Noedup either saw the stone
> carvings or rubbings of them. ?The original Guanxiu paintings were 
> destroyed
> in the 19th century.
>
> http://vc.lib.harvard.edu/vc/deliver/~rubbings/olvwork348704
>
> Best,
>
> John
>
In reply to: Message from john.nebel at csdco.com (John Nebel) ([Leica] Arhat Bakula)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Arhat Bakula)
Message from john.nebel at csdco.com (John Nebel) ([Leica] Arhat Bakula)
Message from pasvorn at boonmark.net (Pasvorn Boonmark) ([Leica] Arhat Bakula)
Message from john.nebel at csdco.com (John Nebel) ([Leica] Arhat Bakula)