Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/01/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Nathan's PAD 27/1/2011: that's why I want a MF film scanner
From: lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll)
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 22:37:16 +0100
References: <038B68DC-3B2D-4034-9B5F-3ACAB55C3242@frozenlight.eu>

Nathan,

I think is a very good scanning, it could be better? sure! IMO the  
question is if you want make a really good quality print, what would  
you do? a wet print on a professional Lab as Copia? or a printed one  
on a Epson?. IMO the wet print quality will be higher than any other.

Saludos
Lluis


El 28/01/2011, a las 22:29, Nathan Wajsman escribi?:

> Actually the picture was taken a couple of weeks ago, but I just got  
> the negs this week. Scanned on my Epson 700, it is not bad, but I am  
> sure it would be better with a film scanner. Sadly, the flextight  
> scanners are a bit out of my range, given that we bought a new car  
> last year ;-)
>
> http://www.greatpix.eu/All/Picture-A-Day/4253606_netUM#1170406922_Ypdnu-O-LB
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
> Nathan Wajsman
> Alicante, Spain
> http://www.frozenlight.eu
> http://www.greatpix.eu
> http://www.nathanfoto.com
> PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
> Blog: http://www.fotocycle.dk/blog
>
> YNWA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Nathan's PAD 27/1/2011: that's why I want a MF film scanner)