Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] The changing role of the male IMG
From: afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com)
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 20:45:17 -0400
References: <BANLkTim0YnZv89cC+f5qpmHZDwUzEb686w@mail.gmail.com> <a4b39dff9c1b28269a4f786b395c70ed.squirrel@emailmg.globat.com>

I was struck by how the role of the father and grandfather is so different
today.

http://tinyurl.com/434fhpe

but then perhaps a lot of it is hype. After all, the love our fathers felt
for us is unlikely to be all that different, and there is evidence that
they were involved: me with my father in the tub:

http://tinyurl.com/444tk4h

The more things change, the more they are really the same.

Alastair



Replies: Reply from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] power of the pixel)
Reply from dstella1 at ameritech.net (Dante Stella) ([Leica] The changing role of the male IMG)
Reply from lluisripollquerol at gmail.com (Lluis Ripoll) ([Leica] The changing role of the male IMG)
In reply to: Message from lam.joev at gmail.com (Joseph V. Lam) ([Leica] photo links)
Message from afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com) ([Leica] photo links)