Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/04/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Triangles
From: afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com)
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:47:20 -0400
References: <225e99c0d74989b389b49fbdfd3b9501@mail.gmail.com> <52416812-B283-4753-BE18-B14B24B4BC9B@usjet.net> <09c554969ebce2fb6bf78c4c1ca53da5@mail.gmail.com> <945F2BFA-9957-48A4-9B88-7FA7D6762EDD@usjet.net>

> I have gone back to the same bridge over the Mississippi and made a
> shot with the Hasselblad.  Both the original 35mm rectangle and the
> Hasselblad square are here side by side.   I would appreciate
> comments on the comparison and your reactions to the two.    Thanks,
> Robert
>
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Robert+Meier/Black+and+White/
> Triangles.jpg.html

I prefer the vertical, but more so because of the way the light is playing
off the water, the 'structure' of both is good in a graphic sense, just
different. Perhaps I prefer the vertical a 'shade'.

Alastair



Replies: Reply from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] Triangles)
In reply to: Message from jshulman at judgecrater.com (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] PESO: Bad Ass Faeries)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] PESO: Bad Ass Faeries)
Message from jshulman at judgecrater.com (Jim Shulman) ([Leica] PESO: Bad Ass Faeries)
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (Robert Meier) ([Leica] Triangles)