[Leica] DMR V D3s

[afirkin at afirkin.com (afirkin at afirkin.com)]

Since you told me of your experience, I have always used the DMR as a 400
ISO or less and underexposed to 'push' exposure with good results, but not
to 6400: I'll give it a try

Cheers

Alastair

> Not that this represents a rigorous test, but I've made exposures at an
> exposure index of 6400 with the DMR (ISO 400, 4 stops under-exposed) and
> the resulting photos were certainly web-acceptable after a quick trip
> through Photoshop:
>
> http://wildlightphoto.com/birds/tyrannidae/atfl00.html
>
> (cropped, 560mm f/6.8, 1/125 sec, shoulder stock & monopod)
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
>>From: grduprey at mchsi.com
>>Sent: Apr 23, 2011 11:22 AM
>>To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>Subject: Re: [Leica] DMR V D3s
>>
>>I will be interested in your testing/comparisons also.
>>
>>gene
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist3 at mac.com>
>>To: "Leica Users Group" <lug at leica-users.org>
>>Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 8:55:13 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
>>Subject: Re: [Leica] DMR V D3s
>>
>>Alastair,
>>
>>I will be most interested in your comparison of
>>dynamic range
>>and
>>fine detail rendering
>>at ISO 100, 200, 400
>>
>>as well as
>>viewfinder brightness and focusing
>>with R glass
>>
>>thanks,
>>
>>Regards,
>>George Lottermoser
>>george at imagist.com
>>http://www.imagist.com
>>http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>