Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/06/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Another R option
From: mark at (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 01:56:44 -0400

This is a guy playing with a lot of cameras. Perhaps on the world of DSLR's
he's more at home and not out of this depth but here talking about the M9,
in the world of rangefinder and Leica he comes across as a guy who usually
reviews hard disks and flash drives who not has to review the new first out
full frame M rangefinder digital from Leica. Not quite but almost. And he
doesn't even have that good of a perspective on it.
This article is no threat to Leica M9 use and will be of no interest to


> From: Jayanand Govindaraj <jayanand at>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at>
> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 07:36:56 +0530
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Another R option
> Richard,
> Hats off to you, you are a brave man. Braver still if anyone follows the
> link to Lloyd Chambers' (digilloyd) article. (-:
> Cheers
> Jayanand
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Richard Man <richard at> 
> wrote:
>> Doug, this is the LUG, where that's only one true answer (tm).
>> Of course each one of us has our own OTA. Some people even have 2 or 3 all
>> by themselves!
>> And if everyone would just accept mine, then there's no issue.... and that
>> would make an awfully quiet list :-)
>> p.s. did anyone else see this Michael Johnston blog guest-posted by
>> L.T.Gray
>> on the perils of trashing the CURRENT Leica products?
>> tskbad-very-bad.html
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See for more information

Replies: Reply from jayanand at (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Another R option)
Reply from photo.forrest at (Philip Forrest) ([Leica] Another R option)
In reply to: Message from jayanand at (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Another R option)