Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: Ten new film images from the Netherlands
From: benedenia at gmail.com (Marty Deveney)
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 16:03:42 +0930
References: <000501cc3a10$eaa39aa0$bfeacfe0$@chiaroscuro.co.nz> <CA36D28A.113F5%mark@rabinergroup.com>

I found the pull setting was useful for limiting depth of field in
daylight portraits and food shots where the light was suitable.  It
definitely does decrease dynamic range.

Marty


On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> 
wrote:
> As you've used it and I've of course not the smart money would be on your
> opinion over mine. I wonder though why they'd put in a pull setting? What's
> it for?
>
>
> Mark William Rabiner
>
>
>> From: John McMaster <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 18:09:21 +1200
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] IMG: Ten new film images from the Netherlands
>>
>> I think the pull setting (80asa) reduces the tonal range it can record
>> compared to normal (160asa)
>>
>> john
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> Even using a nice ball head with an M9 and Leica glass at the minimum iso 
>> or
>> pull setting would be bound to be revelatory.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] IMG: Ten new film images from the Netherlands)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] IMG: Ten new film images from the Netherlands)