Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]You didn't do any sharpening after hand? How about during hand? Check all your prefs? Menus in your menus? Its got a very hard look to me. Really verging on too hard. Mark William Rabiner > From: Bob Adler <rgacpa at yahoo.com> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 18:25:12 -0700 > To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Medium Format Digital > > Hi Mark, > The pixels in this image have not been sharpened to protect the innocent > (unless of course LR applied some sharpening when it output to the web...). > > Bob Adler > http://www.rgaphoto.com > > On Jul 7, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Mark Rabiner <mark at rabinergroup.com> wrote: > >> I think an advantage to medium format digital is it can take a lot of >> sharpening and not get all funny. >> This to me is also an advantage to using lower ISO's... >> than maybe you'd think you'd even need. >> >> A high iso small format capture makes of an image which needs to be >> sharpened very very carefully; as you can go to far and the next day you >> look at it and you realized you have to redo it. Unless there is a layer >> in >> Photoshop for sharpening. Which I'd think there easily could be. >> >> >> Mark William Rabiner >> >> >> >>> From: Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> >>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:52:26 -0400 >>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >>> Subject: Re: [Leica] Medium Format Digital >>> >>> Now that is one sharp photo!! You had a clear view of Owens Valley. >>> When >>> we went up two days later there was a lot of haze. Here is my panorama >>> from >>> the same spot: >>> http://www.pbase.com/image/136216932 >>> >>> I have a problem smoothing out skies in panoramas. Are you using >>> Photoshop >>> to stitch your's? >>> >>> Tina >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 2:42 AM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at yahoo.com> wrote: >>> >>>> My P45+ stitched in portrait orientation (18mm shift on each side) with >>>> the >>>> 35mm lens gives a rough equivalent of a medium format 17.5mm lens. That >>>> translates into what, about a 12mm rectilinear 35mm equivalent? >>>> >>>> And you want what? >>>> See: >>>> http://www.rgaphoto.com/GT/content/Valley_View_Pano_W_large.html >>>> >>>> This image is from 3 main segments produced by using 3 back shifts with >>>> a >>>> portrait oriented P45+ and 35mm lens, for each segment. The 3 back >>>> shifts >>>> of >>>> each segment were stitched together from the images of the 35mm lens >>>> shifted >>>> in portrait orientation. This roughly equates to the view of each of >>>> the 3 >>>> segments equaling the field of view of a 17.5mm medium format lens/ 12mm >>>> lens on a 35mm format system. 3of these were stitched(swinging the >>>> camera >>>> on a panoramic head) to give the image. It was then cropped. The file is >>>> over 2.2GB. >>>> >>>> Give me a place to stand and I will hang this image! >>>> >>>> In all seriousness there are some correctly stated and some overstated >>>> items in this expose. But all in all, medium format for landscapes is >>>> at a >>>> really nice place right now... >>>> >>>> Anyone want to buy some Hassy V and Canon equip? :-) >>>> Bob >>>> >>>> Bob Adler >>>> http://www.rgaphoto.com >>>> >>>> On Jul 6, 2011, at 9:25 PM, Richard Man <richard at imagecraft.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> My pipe dream is that someone, well, Fuji specifically :-) would make a >>>>> >>>>> 18x49mm sensor, and build a digital RF system for it. The sensor size >>>>> is >>>>> just about the same size as the "full frame" 35mm, so the technology >>>>> and >>>>> cost is known (remember that full frame Canon and Sony are as "low" as >>>>> $2500). >>>>> >>>>> The result would of course be a cropped digital XPan. The lens should >>>>> be >>>>> much easier to design - heck, lets make them all F2.8 while we are at >>>>> it. >>>>> >>>>> Sell the whole system with 3 lens (30, 45 and 90 equivalent) for >>>>> $10,000 >>>> to >>>>> $12,000, and I bet they will sell at least as many of that as Pentax >>>> 645D. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> >>>>> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/> >>>>> // richard's personal photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com> >>>>> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all >>>> previous >>>>> replies in your msgs. ] >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Leica Users Group. >>>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leica Users Group. >>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Tina Manley, ASMP >>> www.tinamanley.com >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information