Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Medium Format Digital
From: pasvorn at boonmark.net (Pasvorn Boonmark)
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 20:49:41 -0700
References: <CAH1UNJ2cByyah3tvt+yC4-UZAEbnA_BxDkPAtqayDO8-6yyU1A@mail.gmail.com> <7F3E2370-990E-4571-A5C5-B353D63F4451@frozenlight.eu> <CAF8hL-G5hY9YR6AmPSy_Y9gGBaxjhbsvRAb2t285VvuoyHFVoQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DDBEC6F-268D-4A5F-A2D0-75E282F03A1A@yahoo.com>

Bob,

That is just gorgeous.

-Pasvorn

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Bob Adler <rgacpa at yahoo.com> wrote:

> My P45+ stitched in portrait orientation (18mm shift on each side) with the
> 35mm lens gives a rough equivalent of a medium format 17.5mm lens. That
> translates into what, about a 12mm rectilinear 35mm equivalent?
>
> And you want what?
> See:
> http://www.rgaphoto.com/GT/content/Valley_View_Pano_W_large.html
>
> This image is from 3 main segments produced by using 3 back shifts with a
> portrait oriented P45+ and 35mm lens, for each segment. The 3 back shifts 
> of
> each segment were stitched together from the images of the 35mm lens 
> shifted
> in portrait orientation. This roughly equates to the view of each of the 3
> segments equaling the field of view of a 17.5mm medium format lens/ 12mm
> lens on a 35mm format system.  3of these were stitched(swinging the camera
> on a panoramic head) to give the image. It was then cropped. The file is
> over 2.2GB.
>
>


In reply to: Message from jayanand at gmail.com (Jayanand Govindaraj) ([Leica] Medium Format Digital)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Medium Format Digital)
Message from richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man) ([Leica] Medium Format Digital)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] Medium Format Digital)