Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] (FF) waned
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 00:19:59 -0400

I'm game! So what's the difference between a macro shot and a close up?
I'm afraid I use both terms interchangeably my whole life with my
photographer friends.
And basically from all I've read its all about a meter or three feet or
closer.  I think I've got this from reading countless articles by columnists
in photo magazines for 3.5 decades and by looking at the rather complex
markings on my macro lenses which indicate magnification and so on.

By the way I just wiki'd it and the guy says a macro shot  is a shot in
which the shot, first neg, but later print is bigger than the subject
itself.
This I would call BS. NEVER have I heard that one before!

Most macro lenes before a decade ago by the way did not even focus to 1:1
1:2 was about the norm you needed add ons to get 1:1 a thing which most
people I've ever met never bothered with.


Mark William Rabiner


> From: John McMaster <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 15:57:56 +1200
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] (FF) waned
> 
> This is much more a close-up rather than macro...
> 
> john
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> Macro grab shots are not uncommon here on the LUG but in my opinion macro 
> is
> hard.  Way harder than it looks. And its hard to do a successful macro grab
> shot. The best macro shots I feel take a bit more time and require some
> technique. And require more shots which you pick from to get one which is
> good.
> 
> 
> Mark William Rabiner
> 
> 
>> From: John McMaster <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz>
>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 15:42:47 +1200
>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Leica] (FF) waned
>> 
>> Thanks Mark, it was a lazy shot (handheld and at low asa speed ;-))
>> but I quite liked it
>> 
>> john
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> 
>> The muted colors are refreshing but I'd stop down so we have more
>> information to look at. All we get is a tantalizing sixtieth of an
>> inch slice of some of the globs!  Our eye keeps searching for detail
>> and its now quite sure where to look.
>> Also its best if the areas which are in focus in macro work be in the
>> forefront. In front. In the foreground. As our eye goes their first.
>> To have stuff in the back be soft we expect that. As its in the
>> background we're less worried about it But having stuff in the front
>> where we look first look soft is jarring.
>> Its like there are soft blobs "in the way".
>> 
>> 
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> From: John McMaster <john at chiaroscuro.co.nz>
>>> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 15:30:49 +1200
>>> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
>>> Subject: [Leica] (FF) waned
>>> 
>>> I cannot match the bright colours of the northern hemisphere
>>> currently, so here is one past its best....
>>> 
>>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Chiaroscuro/Flowers/waned.jpg.html
>>> 
>>> C & C welcome (as always)
>>> 
>>> John
>>> 
>>> Canon 5D MkI (new to me), APO-Macro 100mm
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




Replies: Reply from imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser) ([Leica] (FF) waned)
Reply from jhnichols at lighttube.net (Jim Nichols) ([Leica] (FF) waned)
Reply from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] (FF) waned)
In reply to: Message from john at chiaroscuro.co.nz (John McMaster) ([Leica] (FF) waned)