Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well, making money isn't the #1 priority for everyone. It takes work to make money with one's photography, and some times it's just too much work. Well, at least I use that as a justification :-) I have to say though, in terms of # of frames, I definitely shoot more frames with the M9 and the E-3, especially on the E-3 for taiko and other events. It would be prohibitive and silly to shoot that many frames on film, unless one is a professional making real money. For the film shots though, the incremental cost really isn't much since I process my own B&W On Sun, Jul 17, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Tina Manley <images at comporium.net> wrote: > But shooting digital is SO MUCH CHEAPER than film. You can pay for an M9 in > no time. ?Really, no time. > -- // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/> // icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/> // richard's personal photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous replies in your msgs. ]