Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] IMG: New Casual portrait
From: richard at imagecraft.com (Richard Man)
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:33:43 -0700
References: <CAE3QcF7nppD2CezSxe2HhG542zid7eA9m_fLJXaBFQbGUGw+BQ@mail.gmail.com> <1311002367.79655.YahooMailRC@web82108.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <CAJ4y7gwXdx9Jih3mS4FCnL1C=-NwRu8QqxWty=R=GkSiW58kPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAE3QcF4Emn5X438TCp=wVvKyBSjf9D13SB5KBgwyPOYNR8Wyuw@mail.gmail.com>

Yes, I shoot up to ISO 1250 on the M9 without thinking about it. If
the images are good, no one notices the noise :-)

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Geoff Hopkinson <hopsternew at gmail.com> 
wrote:
> Thanks for looking. 1000 ISO is perfectly usable with the M9. Much of the
> noise people talk about is seen due to underexposure and then lifting those
> darks to compensate in development. Or pixel peeping at 100%
> Lightroom allows for easy noise reduction in developing (in concert with
> capture sharpening. I just checked and I've shot more than a third of my
> exposures this year at 1000 ISO. See ?the Tribal Cirque ones I just posted
> too.
>

-- 
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com/>
// icc blog: <http://imagecraft.com/blog/>
// richard's personal photo blog: <http://www.5pmlight.com>
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all
previous replies in your msgs. ]


In reply to: Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG: New Casual portrait)
Message from rgacpa at yahoo.com (Bob Adler) ([Leica] IMG: New Casual portrait)
Message from robertbaron1 at gmail.com (Robert Baron) ([Leica] IMG: New Casual portrait)
Message from hopsternew at gmail.com (Geoff Hopkinson) ([Leica] IMG: New Casual portrait)