Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digital vs. film cost
From: imagist3 at mac.com (George Lottermoser)
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:15:14 -0500
References: <CA4A3527.12141%mark@rabinergroup.com>

On Jul 18, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> Not only is it not pennies but dollars a frame but part of transparency
> shooting is bracketing. Which means your covering yourself whenever you can
> with lots of exposures of any semi critical subject out in the field
> shooting city or land scapes if its worth getting its worth getting right
> and you learn a lot about your materials in the processs. Also the best
> "dupe" is the one make at the time in camera. So you are in effect backing
> yourself up  holding your figure down.

There IT is.

Words from a fellow brother
who has most certainly shot transparencies
for commercial use by
advertising agencies, magazines and corporate clients.

Each set-up required a minimum of 3 brackets X 2.
That's 6 sheets of 8x10 or 4x5 or half a role of 120 (6x6).



Regards,
George Lottermoser 
george at imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com
http://www.imagist.com/blog
http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist







Replies: Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Digital vs. film cost)
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Digital vs. film cost)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Digital vs. film cost)