Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digital vs. film cost
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:19:53 -0400

I got distracter by the pots!  My were those gorgeous! Not copper I don't
think! But I think Maviel Stainless Steel.  However we could make them
copper colored!


Mark William Rabiner




> From: Tina Manley <images at comporium.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 08:18:50 -0400
> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital vs. film cost
> 
> There is a software program, developed for HDR, that has ability to adjust
> mixed lighting in processing.  It's amazing.
> 
> http://www.oloneo.com/en/page/photoengine/hdr-relight.html
> 
> I was a beta tester for it but have no other connection.  I did buy it.
> 
> Tina
> 
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Henning Wulff <henningw at 
> archiphoto.com>wrote:
> 
>> And sometimes I had to do a ring around with filtration for indoor
>> architectural work with mixed lighting, which multiplied that times 9.
>> That's why I also shot colour neg as soon as it started to do a good job.
>> Fine tuning of colour and exposure could be done in the lab; shooting time
>> decreased to 1/2 or 1/3 and material costs dropped to 5-10%.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 2011-07-18, at 4:15 PM, George Lottermoser wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jul 18, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Not only is it not pennies but dollars a frame but part of transparency
>>>> shooting is bracketing. Which means your covering yourself whenever you
>> can
>>>> with lots of exposures of any semi critical subject out in the field
>>>> shooting city or land scapes if its worth getting its worth getting
>> right
>>>> and you learn a lot about your materials in the processs. Also the best
>>>> "dupe" is the one make at the time in camera. So you are in effect
>> backing
>>>> yourself up  holding your figure down.
>>> 
>>> There IT is.
>>> 
>>> Words from a fellow brother
>>> who has most certainly shot transparencies
>>> for commercial use by
>>> advertising agencies, magazines and corporate clients.
>>> 
>>> Each set-up required a minimum of 3 brackets X 2.
>>> That's 6 sheets of 8x10 or 4x5 or half a role of 120 (6x6).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> George Lottermoser
>>> george at imagist.com
>>> http://www.imagist.com
>>> http://www.imagist.com/blog
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Leica Users Group.
>>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Henning Wulff
>> henningw at archiphoto.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> www.tinamanley.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information




In reply to: Message from images at comporium.net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Digital vs. film cost)