Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/07/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Lusting for an M9
From: jshulman at judgecrater.com (Jim Shulman)
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:48:56 -0400
References: <CAEve6XjO26Aj1Xfe_ykXrw-M6U7WoLGT5Vnsf6iuVejEzT1AmQ@mail.gmail.com> <D0AF7353-CE9F-475D-A18E-D8E80262BE8B@frozenlight.eu> <01be01cc488d$04a0d6e0$0de284a0$@earthlink.net>

Considering the performance at high ISO, why do you need the f1.2 aperture
(other than DOF).  The Summilux should be more than fine.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jshulman=judgecrater.com at leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Frank Filippone
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 12:33 PM
To: 'Leica Users Group'
Subject: Re: [Leica] Lusting for an M9

An idea....

Sell the Nocti 1.2 to a collector.  Buy the M9 with a ASPH Summilux or
with
the new Nocti .95.

Should be about an even cash swap......when you also sell the M5 and Macro
Elmarit.

Everyone is happy.....

Frank Filippone
Red735i at earthlink.net

> All: I'm considering selling old technology to buy new technology. The
> love objects I have in mind are the following: 1.  The original
> Noctilux, 50mm,
> f1.2 lens. 2. The M5 body. 3. The R-Macro 100 mm f2.8 lens



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from michiel.fokkema at gmail.com (Michiel Fokkema) ([Leica] Lusting for an M9)
In reply to: Message from scleroplex at gmail.com (scleroplex) ([Leica] Lusting for an M9)
Message from photo at frozenlight.eu (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Lusting for an M9)
Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Lusting for an M9)