Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark Rabiner wrote: >Even If you did it at my screen size which is 800 x 1280 you put post it to >the Linhof Master Technique list and have shot it with your pocket point and >shoot and without the metadata none of them would know the difference. >I do think that's what makes it worth it to have some prints made. >You get to see how your doing and not get lazy. As in super cropping a >photo. > > > >-- >Mark R. >http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/lugalrabs/ > > > >> From: Lawrence Zeitlin <lrzeitlin at gmail.com> >> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:05:08 -0400 >> To: Leica Users Group <lug at leica-users.org> >> Subject: [Leica] Leica vs. Canon >> >> Tina, >> >> Leica, Canon, Holga. What's the difference? All cameras are alike on the >> web. Well, maybe not the Holga. The computer screen is a great leveler. >> > When I used a 400mm Canon lens people saw the difference between it and the 400mm f/6.8 Telyt, even at screen resolution. I didn't ask anyone if they saw a difference, they saw my website & e-mailed to ask what happened. Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com