Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/08/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I second that. I have never seen a viewfinder in any SLR, film or digital, as good as the SL/SL2. I also agree with R8 being in a close second place. Cheers, Nathan On 25 Aug, 2011, at 8:53 , philippe.amard wrote: > > Le 25 ao?t 11 ? 08:13, Frank Filippone a ?crit : > >> >> I'm not looking for precisely made calculations or measurements, but if >> you >> were to compare the relative brightness of the VF in the Nikon or Canon AF >> cameras or the R8 or SL to the Visoflex, which would be brighter and by >> how >> much????? >> > > The SL comes first, hand down > followed by R8 (sighs) > far behind is my D700 (not 100% coverage either) > > these are cameras I owned and used > > Hope it answers your question > Ph > > >> >> >> The lenses in question are the 400 and 560 Telyts.. >> >> >> >> Impressions are fine.. >> >> >> >> Frank Filippone >> >> Red735i at earthlink.net >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > Nathan Wajsman Alicante, Spain http://www.frozenlight.eu http://www.greatpix.eu http://www.nathanfoto.com Books: http://www.blurb.com/bookstore/search?search=wajsman&x=0&y=0 PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws Image licensing: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman Blog: http://www.nathansmusings.eu