Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/09/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Yes, as Philippe says you could afford to have your mid-tones brighter. You have a tiny amount of highlight clipping which might be just a thin edge of petals. Absolutely no problem there. If you program allows you could easily move your mid-tones to the right if you wanted without creating significantly more clipping. I guess you are using the common approach of a little underexposure to preserve the highlights?. Cheers Geoff *It's lonely and quiet and the horse-soldiers are coming.* ** On 12 September 2011 06:08, philippe.amard <philippe.amard at sfr.fr> wrote: > Just what I was about to write :-) > > I think you could still increase luminosity one click here > > Bien cordialement > Philippe > > Le 11 sept. 11 ? 21:58, Robert Meier a ?crit : > > Interesting hexagonal specular out of focus highlights. >> >> >> >> On Sep 11, 2011, at 2:48 PM, Jim Nichols wrote: >> >> Still working on exposure and post-processing. The white RoS blooms make >>> a challenging subject. This one seems to be closer to what I would like >>> to >>> achieve. >>> >>> http://gallery.leica-users.**org/v/OldNick/The+Top.jpg.html<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/The+Top.jpg.html> >>> >>> Comments and critiques welcomed. I have learned a lot from your >>> comments. >>> >>> Jim Nichols >>> Tullahoma, TN USA >>> >>> ______________________________**_________________ >>> Leica Users Group. >>> See >>> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >>> more information >>> >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >> more information >> > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Leica Users Group. > See > http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for > more information >