Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2011/10/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I like this in the comments: "I?m afraid I can?t argree with your choices, I think the ?photographers?? I?ll most ignore are Bryan Formhals and Blake Andrews." Tina On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Ken Carney <kcarney1 at cox.net> wrote: > Who is Bryan Formhals? I think there is a clue to the link for novels that > are harmful for aspiring writers - Blood Meridian, On the Road, etc. > Sounds > like someone who is under extreme pressure to publish. > > Ken > > > On 10/9/2011 4:43 PM, Peter Klein wrote: > >> I came upon this today: >> <http://portable.tv/loves/**post/photographers-you-should-**ignore/<http://portable.tv/loves/post/photographers-you-should-ignore/> >> > >> (a couple of the example photos are not work-safe) >> >> Thoughts: >> While there is a kernel of truth to each item, the whole piece comes off >> as very cynical and snarky. It does point out how many photographs today >> are >> mostly about the technique used or the cool-school-du-jour that they >> adhere >> to. And how now that everybody can take technically passable photos, an >> incredible amount of garbage is generated, which can bury the good stuff >> by >> its sheer volume. >> >> And yet, beauty is still beauty, pathos is still pathos, and insight is >> still insight. >> >> --Peter >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See >> http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for >> more information >> >> > > ______________________________**_________________ > Leica Users Group. > See > http://leica-users.org/**mailman/listinfo/lug<http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug>for > more information > > -- Tina Manley, ASMP www.tinamanley.com